fujc683/gpt-image-2-6-flare-vs-sunburst

选用指南

AI 根据 README 整理 · 2026/11/6 14:21:52

适用场景

适合需要生成图像草稿、批量迭代或最终成品的场景，Flare适合草稿和批量，Sunburst适合最终成品和文字密集布局。

查看 README 依据

[💰 Pricing](https://gola.apimart.ai/k-wbS8wn) · [🔑 Get an API key](https://gola.apimart.ai/k-sTNFPs) --- ## Two variants, one model GPT Image 2.6 ships two serving profiles. Same prompt language, different compute budget. | | Flare | Sunburst | |---|---|---| | Price | $0.0198 | $0.0198 | | Speed | faster | slower | | Detail / adherence | good | **better** | | Best for | drafts, bulk, iteration | finals, text-heavy layouts | ## How to choose ``` drafting 10 ideas → Flare picking the best → Flare final asset → Sunburst ``` ## Same prompt, both variants ```python

使用方式

通过API调用两种变体，示例代码展示如何使用。

查看 README 依据

for model in ("gpt-image-2.6-flare", "gpt-image-2.6-sunburst"): r = client.images.generate(model=model, prompt=PROMPT, n=1) ``` ## Cost implication Because both are priced the same per image, the practical difference is **time, not money**. Use Sunburst for anything a human will look at twice. --- ## Related - Prompt library: [gpt-image-2-6-prompts](https://github.com/fujc683/awesome-gpt-image-2-6-prompts) - More image models: [awesome prompt collections](https://github.com/fujc683?tab=repositories) ## License CC BY 4.0